BENJAMIN HASLEM
This breathless media release (complete with incorrect date) has been put out by the Alcohol Education & Rehabilitation Foundation:
New national market research reveals over 2.2 million Australians over the age of 14 experienced physical and/or verbal abuse during the recent December – January holiday period from someone under the influence of alcohol.
Really? And how did the AERF reach this startling conclusion?
An on-line survey.
The release doesn't explain where the link to the on-line survey was. However, such surveys are inherently problematic. Primarily because respondents are self selected. Therefore you get a highly skewed sample, with people with a gripe about alcohol and drunks more likely to take the survey.
This can be partly remedied, but still without great reliability, with on-line omnibus surveys covering a range of subjects but including one or two questions about alcohol. Perhaps a survey on spending habits covering mobile phones, clothes, entertainment and alcohol (including questions about abuse and booze).
Unfortunately, the release doesn't give a lot of detail of the on-line survey, other than there were 1,000 respondents. That's an awfully small (and unreliable) sample from which to extrapolate that 2.2 million Australians were subjects of abuse.
Finally, how do the respondents know the abuser was "under the influence of alcohol"? Did they breath-test them? Could they (abusers) have been mentally ill, under the influence of other drugs or just having a bad day?
Alcohol-related violence is a serious issue in Australia. Jackson Wells works with the Australian Hotels Association (NSW), whose members are acutely aware of the public expectation that they serve alcohol responsibly. The AHA (NSW) is a strong supporter of the State's tough Responsible Service of Alcohol laws.
The AHA is also aware of the importance of an evidentiary-based approach to policy making.
The AERF survey does not cut it as evidence. It's pretty poor hearsay. AERF needs quantitative research that will provide statistical validity and therefore reliability and credibility
Short of that, the media release should acknowledge the limitations of the 'research' and be structured to reflect these limitations, such as saying that the survey "suggests" not "reveals" conclusions. Otherwise it's just bad spin.
Not that the media is skeptical. News Limited's news.com.au ran the survey complete with the reporter's own spin: "Research commissioned by the advocacy group Alcohol Education and Rehabilitation (AER) Foundation shows Australia's culture of regular binge drinking is alive and well."
No it doesn't. There is no claim in the 'research' findings that the abusers had been binge drinking.
Recent Comments